Test Pdo Lichko Projti Onlajn

Test Pdo Lichko Projti Onlajn 3,2/5 9778 votes

Test Pdo Lichko Projti Onlajn; Prezentaciya Na Temu Studencheskaya Zhiznj Na Anglijskom; The Hare Psychopathy Checklist Revised Pdf Download; Environmental Problems Of Kazakhstan Prezentaciya; Altova Semanticworks 2009 Free Download. By creating a space where employees can complete their proctored remote online test, jurisdictions demonstrate their commitment to building safety and their employees’ professional development. They also limit the time out of office necessitated by computer–based testing, which must be taken at approved ICC testing centers.

World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct 14; 12(38): 6216–6218.
Published online 2006 Oct 14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6216
PMID: 17036399
This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate Pronto Dry examination in patients with dyspepsia.

METHODS: The study was conducted in patients with dyspepsia who underwent endoscopic examination in several endoscopic centers of several cities in Indonesia from January 2003 until April 2004. Biopsies for histopathologic examination were fixed with formalin and sent to Histopathologic Department to be analyzed and confirm the presence of H pylori infection. If H pylori was found positive, the density was calculated semi quantitatively. Histopathologic examination from gastric biopsy samples was interpreted based on the updated Sydney system classification.

RESULTS: Of 550 patients, 309 (56%) were male and 241 (44%) were female with ages ranging from 15 to 82 years. Mean age was 44.98 ± 14.46 years. Mean age of male patients was 44.35 ± 13.85 years and mean age of female patients was 45.78 ± 15.19 years. Evaluation of endoscopic results showed gastric ulcer in 36 cases (6.5%) and duodenal ulcer in 20 cases (3.6%). Normal endoscopic finding was found in 45 cases (8.2%) and minimal disorder of gastritis and duodenitis were found in 246 cases (44.7%). One case of gastric cancer was identified. Of 56 cases which were positive based on the criteria used, 39 patients were positive with Pronto Dry and 17 patients were negative with Pronto Dry. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Pronto Dry were 69.7% and 95.7% respectively. Positive predictive value was 66.1% and negative predictive value was 96.4% and overall accurate rate was 92.9%.

CONCLUSION: Pronto Dry seems promising as a diagnostic tool to detect H pylori more rapidly and accurately.

Keywords: Rapid urease test, Pronto Dry, H pylori, Dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

H pylori is a microaerophylic, gram negative, slowly growing, and pathogenic bacterium which produces urease enzyme[1]. H pylori may cause chronic gastritis and predispose to gastric and duodenal ulcer. Recently, H pylori has been classified as gastric carcinogen class 1[2,3].

Diagnosis of H pylori may be made by invasive or non invasive methods. During the invasive method patients would undergo endoscopic examination and gastric tissue biopsy. Samples and biopsies are examined to detect the presence of H pylori by histopathologic examination, rapid urease test or culture[,]. Culture examination is the gold standard test. Culture examination is not simple because transport media and biopsy samples for observation of the growth of the bacteria need special preparation procedures.

Non invasive methods include the rapid urease test, serologic and H pylori examination of the feces (H pylori stool antigen)[]. Rapid urease test is frequently done in endoscopic centers in patients with dyspepsia to detect the presence of H pylori. This method is rapid and easy to perform in the endoscopic room. Currently, there are various kinds of rapid urease test in the market such as CLO, MIU or Pyloric test and a recent one called Pronto Dry. The advantage of this method is that it is not necessary to keep the sample in the refrigerator, a rapid result may be obtained only in 1 h, and it is easy to read the color changes. Previous studies have shown this test has good sensitivity and specificity[,].

The aim of the present study was to evaluate Pronto Dry examination in patients with dyspepsia in several endoscopic centers in Indonesia including Jakarta, Bandung, Surabaya, Denpasar, Yogyakarta and Medan.

Hip hop ejay 5 crack gratis youtube

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Research subjects

The study was conducted in patients with dyspepsia who underwent endoscopic examination in the endoscopic centers of several cities in Indonesia which were as follows: RSCM Jakarta, RS Hasan Sadikin Bandung, RS Sardjito Yogyakarta, RS Soetomo Surabaya, RS Adam Malik Medan, and RS Sanglah Denpasar. The study period was from Jan 2003 until Apr 2004.

Inclusion criteria were patients who had been diagnosed dyspepsia and would undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination, with age more than 15 years old. Patients were not taking antibiotics, H2 receptor antagonists or proton pump inhibitors during 7 d prior to the examination.

Patients who had fulfilled inclusion criteria had endoscopic examination and biopsy samples were taken two in the antrum and two more in the corpus. Pronto Dry (Medical Instruments Corporation, Solothurn, Switzerland) was performed according to standard procedure and interpretation was read in 1 h after examination.

Biopsies for histopathologic examination were fixed with formalin and sent to Histopathologic Department to be analyzed and confirm the presence of H pylori infection. If H pylori was found positive, its density would be read semi quantitatively. Histopathologic examination of gastric biopsy samples was interpreted based on the Updated Sydney system classification.

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical calculation to test sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy was done using statistics software. P < 0.05 was taken as significant.

RESULTS

This multicentre study was conducted in 6 endoscopic centers. Each unit collected various numbers of cases and most were obtained from endoscopic room in RSCM, Jakarta. The number of patients included in the study was 550 consisting of 320 (58.2%) patients from RSCM Jakarta, 40 (7.3%) patients from RS Adam Malik Medan, 60 (10.9%) patients from RS Sutomo Surabaya, 37 (6.7%) patients from RS Sardjito Yogyakarta, 43 (7.8%) patients from RS Sanglah Denpasar Bali and 50 (9.1%) patients from RS Hasan Sadikin Bandung.

Of 550 patients included in this study, 309 patients (56%) were male and 241 patients (44%) were female (Figure (Figure1)1) with age ranging from 15 years to 82 years. Mean age was 44.98 ± 14.46 years. Mean age of male patients was 44.35 ± 13.85 years and of female patients was 45.78 ± 15.19 years.

Distribution of patients based on gender.

Evaluation of endoscopic results showed gastric ulcer was found in 36 cases (6.5%) and duodenal ulcer in 20 cases (3.6%). Normal endoscopic finding was found in 45 cases (8.2%) and minimal disorders of gastritis and duodenitis were found in 246 cases (44.7%). In addition, one case of gastric cancer was identified (Table (Table11).

Table 1

Pdo

Results of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy of patients with dyspepsia

Endoscopic diagnosisn%
Normal 458.2
Gastritis and or duodenitis24644.7
Gastric ulcer 366.5
Duodenal ulcer 203.6
Mild erosive gastritis 8315.1
Esophagitis 8515.5
Gastric cancer10.2
Mild erosive gastritis/Esophagitis20.4
Severe erosive gastritis 162.9
Gr. B Esophagitis/Mmoderate gastritis61.1
Barrett’s esophagus20.4
Esophagitis, gastric ulcer10.2
Esophagitis, pangastritis, duodenal ulcer10.2

Diagnosis of H pylori infection

Based on definition determined at the beginning of the study, H pylori infection was considered positive if histopathologic examination showed the presence of H pylori. Of 550 cases studied, H pylori was found positive in 56 (10.2%). The highest prevalence of H pylori was found in patients from Yogyakarta (30.6%) and the lowest was in patients from Jakarta (8%).

Of 550 patients, 25 did not have histopathologic examinations. Furthermore, analysis on sensitivity and specificity was done with only 525 patients because they had complete examination with both histopathology and Pronto Dry. Of 56 cases which were positive based on the criteria used, 39 were positive with Pronto Dry and 17 were negative with Pronto Dry. Overall sensitivity and specificity of Pronto Dry were 69.7% and 95.7%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 66.1% and negative predictive value was 96.4% and overall accurate rate was 92.9%. If we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of each endoscopic center, results were varied (Table (Table22).

Table 2

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value by Pronto Dry examination at each endoscopic centre

EndoscopiccentreSensitivity(%)Specificity(%)Negativepredictivevalue (%)Positivepredictivevalue (%)Accuratelevel(%)
Jakarta95.798.399.781.598.2
Bandung100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0
Medan100.059.4100.038.167.5
Surabaya33.398.193.066.791.6
Yogyakarta10.0100.075.010075.7
Bali25.094.184.250.081.0

DISCUSSION

To date, the rapid urease test is still needed to detect the presence of H pylori. This test is relatively easy and rapid and thus appropriate therapy is possible if diagnosis of H pylori is confirmed. In addition, upper gastrointestinal endoscopic examination is still a reliable procedure to investigate the cause of dyspepsia.

Our result indicated that endoscopic examination of patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia showed various underlying disorders. Almost 45% of endoscopic results showed organic disorders such as esophagitis, peptic ulcer and erosive gastritis. In addition, 1 of 550 cases in this study was found to be gastric carcinoma. This result indicated that endoscopy is very important in evaluating upper gastrointestinal disorder in patients with dyspepsia. Rapid urease test has become indispensable in patients having the indication for endoscopic procedure.

Of all patients with dyspepsia who had undergone endoscopic examination, H pylori infection was positive in only 10.2% of cases. This figure was lower than the result of multicentered study in Europe published in 1999. In that study involving 501 patients with dyspepsia, 55.7% were found to have positive result of H pylori. Another study conducted in Jakarta found that 9.5% patients with dyspepsia were positive for H pylori infection by endoscopic examination[].

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accurate level were 69.6%, 95.7%, 66.1%, 96.4%, and 92.9%, respectively. A study conduced by Said et al in Malaysia to evaluate Pronto Dry found better sensitivity (98.1%) and specificity (100%)[]. However, if we compared the result of studies in Jakarta and Bandung, similar results to the study in Malaysia were obtained. The study in Jakarta found a sensitivity of 95.7% and specificity of 98.3%, while the study in Bandung found both sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The difference of the results might be due to different histopathologic evaluation criteria adopted by different centers. This, however, could be overcome by standardization of appropriate biopsy location, standardised type of biopsy instrument and samples size and results read by same pathologists.

Rapid urease test using Pronto Dry which is relatively new is found to have good specificity although the sensitivity is lower than specificity. Studies in several cities have shown that Pronto Dry has very good sensitivity and specificity level above 95%. If we compare with the other rapid urease test, Pronto Dry can give result in only 1 h. This test seems very promising as a diagnostic tool to detect H pylori more rapidly and accurately.

Footnotes

References

1. Weeks DL, Scott DR, Voland P, Marcus EA, Athman C, Melchers K, Sachs G. The urease system of Helicobacter pylori. In: Hunt RH, editor. Tytgat GNJ, eds. Helicobacter pylori basic mechanisms to clinical cure 2000. Dordrecht-Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 15–24. [Google Scholar]
2. Lee A. Helicobacter pylori is pathogenic flora. In: Hunt RH, editor. Tytgat GNJ, eds. Helicobacter pylori basic mechanisms to clinical cure 2000. Dordrecht-Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 31–35. [Google Scholar]
3. Blaser MJ. The amphibolic relationship of Helicobacter pylori and humans. In: Hunt RH, editor. Tytgat GNJ, eds. Helicobacter pylori basic mechanisms to clinical cure 2000. Dordrecht-Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. pp. 25–30. [Google Scholar]
4. Goodwin CS, Mendall MM, Northfield TC. Helicobacter pylori infection. Lancet. 1997;349:265–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Suerbaum S, Michetti P. Helicobacter pylori infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1175–1186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Vaira D, Malfertheiner P, Mégraud F, Axon AT, Deltenre M, Hirschl AM, Gasbarrini G, O'Morain C, Garcia JM, Quina M, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection with a new non-invasive antigen-based assay. HpSA European study group. Lancet. 1999;354:30–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Morio O, Rioux-Leclercq N, Pagenault M, Corbinais S, Ramee MP, Gosselin M, Bretagne JF. Prospective evaluation of a new rapid urease test (Pronto Dry) for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;28:569–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Said RM, Cheah PL, Chin SC, Goh KL. Evaluation of a new biopsy urease test: Pronto Dry, for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:195–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Syam AF, Rani AA, Abdullah M, Manan C, Makmun D, Simadibrata M, Djojoningrat D, Sato T. Accuracy of Helicobacter pylori stool antigen for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:386–388.[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

DMV.com FREE Practice Test Sections

Studying for the DMV written exam can be stressful – you want to pass on your first time! DMV.com is keeping it simple by offering a FREE Practice Test. Our FREE practice driver’s test covers relevant sections featured in the California DMV Driver’s Handbook. The free sample driving test questions are created using the DMV drivers manual, and the content is similar to the real written exam. Learn how you will be asked about traffic regulations, road signs and specific driving situations by taking the DMV.com free practice test.

Traffic Laws

Traffic laws create safe and responsible driving situations. To pass the DMV driver’s test, you need to know these laws and regulations. Mastering the rules of the road, dealing with pedestrians, crosswalks, intersections and roundabouts is all a part of becoming a licensed California driver. You can test yourself with the free online practice exam here. Sample Practice Exams from DMV.com are a clear-cut way to learn how much you know about the official written test that awaits.

Traffic Signs

When you start driving in California, you need to recognize road signs and learn to use them while driving your vehicle. Traffic signs are a major part of the written driving test, and a free sample practice test is an excellent tool to confirm you know the answers. You will be tested on:

  • Traffic signal lights.
  • Traffic sign identification.
  • Placards and warning signs.
  • Turns at intersections.

Take the California DMV.com Free Sample Practice Test and become an expert at traffic signs.

Traffic Signal

Responding to traffic signals in the proper way is essential for safe driving. Not to mention, you will get a ticket with a hefty fine if caught running a red light. The CA written driver’s test includes questions about traffic signals, so be sure to test yourself beforehand with a DMV.com FREE practice exam.

Crosswalks and Intersections

Rules for driving safely on a pedestrian crosswalk is important for every driver to learn. Drivers are responsible for knowing his or her way around pedestrians and traffic in a safe manner. Try out the free sample test to confirm if you have a strong handle over the following:

  • ‘Stop’ or ‘Yield’ signs at intersections
  • Yellow markings for school crossings
  • Roundabouts
  • Driving on unmarked crosswalks
  • Turning at corners
  • White-line markings
  • Bicycle lanes
  • T-Intersections

Inclement Weather

Inclement weather is not unusual in California, and you need to know how to drive properly in different weather conditions. It is important to learn procedures for how to drive with mist, ice, fog, heavy wind, rain and snow. The official written exam will test your knowledge on inclement weather driving. The DMV.com sample practice test is the best place to help you prepare and learn about:

  • Driving on slippery mountain roads.
  • Brake failure.
  • Blown tires.
  • Use of windshield wipers and low beam-headlights.
  • Skidding.
  • Emergency flares.

California DMV Driving Exam Study Checklist

For successful results, DMV.com advises you to use this five-step written driving test study checklist to optimize your official test preparations:

  1. Read the official CA Driver’s Handbook. The California drivers handbook contains material about all types of vehicles in the state. Concentrate on the parts about road rules and regulations, traffic signs, parking and safe driving. The official drivers written exam contains questions from all relevant handbook sections that are covered in the DMV free practice exam.
  2. Try out theDMV.com Driver’s License Sample Test to see what awaits you on the official exam. Free sample test questions include traffic rules from the California Driver’s Handbook, and will introduce the real questions from the DMV official written drivers exam.
  3. When you feel safe with the drivers license sample test, order the extended California DMV.com Study Guide. This guide is short summary of the official CA Driver’s Handbook. The information is structured into shorter sections to assist you in learning the important handbook information in a faster and easier way.
  4. When you get the results from your DMV.com Sample Test, you will know which sections on the official written drivers exam you need to concentrate on. If you feel that you need additional support, get a copy of the DMV.com Premium Practice Test.
  5. A score on the sample practice test of at least 90 percent or higher, means that you are a great candidate to get a passing score on the official written exam. Make your exam appointment and pass the first step on your way to the learners permit!

Getting Your CA Driver’s License

Getting a passing score on the DMV CA drivers’ test is the initial step to obtain your first drivers license. To get your drivers license in California, follow this 10-step process:

  1. Begin with the DMV.com California Free Practice Driving Test.
  2. Review the DMV.com Study Guide to strengthen troublesome areas.
  3. Practice with the free sample test until you make sure that you will succeed.
  4. Complete the application and collect the required documents relevant for getting your driver’s license.
  5. Use the California DMV online services to schedule an appointment.
  6. Take the official DMV written knowledge exam.
  7. Get a vision screening certificate.
  8. Pass the road skills exam.
  9. Submit your required forms, documents and fees.
Last updated on Tuesday, January 29 2019.